stack v dowden造句

It may no longer represent good law, since the decisions of " Stack v Dowden " and " Jones v Kernott ".
""'Stack v Dowden " "'[ 2007 ] UKHL 17 is a leading English property law case from the House of Lords case concerning the division of interests in family property after the breakdown of a cohabitation relationship.
Judge Dedman, after considering " Oxley v Hiscock " [ 2005 ] Fam 211 and " Stack v Dowden " [ 2007 ] 2 AC 432, held that while the interests of the parties at the outset might well have been that the property should be split jointly, those intentions had altered significantly over the years.
However, in " Stack v Dowden ", and then " Jones v Kernott " the Law Lords held by a majority that " Rosset " probably no longer represented the law ( if it ever did ) and that a " common intention " to share in the property could be inferred from a wide array of circumstances ( including potentially simply having children together ), and also perhaps " imputed " without any evidence.
It's difficult to find stack v dowden in a sentence. 用stack v dowden造句挺难的